The following jury verdicts and settlements are a representative sampling of those cases our firm has handled on behalf of its clients.
Jury Verdicts and Settlements
$313,000,000 - Forest Laboratories settlement
regarding the anti-depressant drugs Celexa and Lexapro for unapproved pediatric use and paid kick backs
to induce phyiscians to prescribe the drugs
$130,000.00 - settlement in a sexual harrassment/retaliation case against a national bio-tech company (2010)
$250,000.00 - settlement in a sexual harrassment/retaliation case against a Fortune 100 company (2010).
$100,000.00 - Qui tam settlement against a medical delivery firm (2009)
$1,325,000.00 -- settlement in a retaliation case against a financial institution (2007)
$250,000.00 -- valued settlement in a contractual
dispute against an Austrian distributor (2007)
$230,000.00 - settlement in a corporate securities fraud case against multi-jurisdictional defendants in California and Pennsylvania (2007).
$185,000.00 - valued settlement in a termination case of a CEO against an Austrian distributor (2007).
$80,000.00 -- settlement in an Age Discrimination case against a national women's clothier (2006)
$500,000.00 -- valued settlement in a corporate fraud case against a publicly-traded Fortune 100 tobacco company (2006)
$300,000.00 -- settlement in a
Sarbanes-Oxley case against a publicly-traded food distribution
Fortune 500 company (2006)
$90,000.00 -- settlement in a corporate fraud case
against a publicly-traded Fortune 500 medical supply company (2006)
$70,000.00 -- settlement in a retaliation case against a waste water treatment authority (2006)
$7,251,650 -- settlement in a termination case against a food distribution company (2004)
$800,000 -- verdict in the Henrico Circuit Court (1989)
$800,000 -- settlement in a product liability case against a pompom manufacturer (1974)
$725,000 -- settlement in a product liability case against a pharmaceutical company (1998)
$715,000 -- settlement in a sexual harassment case against an insurance company (2002)
$700,000 -- settlement in a product liability case against a pharmaceutical company (1998)
$452,000 -- settlement against a tobacco company (2001)
$450,000 -- settlement against a hospital for Privacy Act violations (1999)
$400,000 -- settlement in a sexual harassment case against an insurance company (1998)
$400,000 -- settlement in a construction case against a roof truss fabricator (1989)
$325,000 -- settlement in a reverse discrimination case against a communications company (1998)
$285,000 -- settlement in wrongful termination cases against a national medical-surgical supply corporation (2002)
$275,000 -- settlement in class action litigation for violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act against a national collections firm (1998)
$260,000 -- settlement in a sexual harassment case against an investment firm (1999)
$237,000 -- settlement in an implied contract case against an international lottery firm (2001)
$220,000 -- valued settlement in a termination case against a tobacco company (2004)
$125,000 -- settlement in a fraudulent inducement case against a power company (2002)
$110,000 -- settlement in an age discrimination case against a tool manufacturer (2002)
$100,000 -- settlement in a sexual harassment case against an investment firm (1999)
$85,000 -- settlement in an age discrimination case against a communication company (2002)
$85,000 -- settlement in a wrongful termination case against a health care corporation (2000)
$80,000 -- settlement in an age discrimination case against a lending institution (2002)
$70,000 -- settlement in a sexual harassment case against a nursing home (2000)
$65,000 -- settlement for Title VII, violation against a trucking company (2004)
$60,000 -- settlement in a sexual harassment case against a medical association (2001)
$60,000 -- settlement for Title VII, violations against a trucking company (2001)
$60,000 -- settlement in a constructive fraud case against a medical supply company (2001)
$50,000 -- settlement in a disability claim against a national retailer (1999)
$50,000 -- settlement in a disability claim against a national brewery (1999)
$40,000 -- settlement in a malicious prosecution case against a corporation (1998)
$35,000 -- settlement for an overtime violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act against a computer company (2000)
$29,000 -- settlement in a wrongful termination case against a Commission (2001)
$25,000 -- settlement for a discrimination case against the federal government (2000)
$17,500 -- settlement in a wrongful termination case against a national meat processor (1998)
It is believed that Mr. Marstiller is the only lawyer in Virginia who has been a partner in a small rural law firm; a prosecutor; a partner-in-charge of one of Virginia's larger law firms' corporate litigation practice; a powerful lobbyist before the Virginia General Assembly representing Fortune 500 companies; and now, President of a law firm which has a national practice on behalf of individuals currently in sixteen (16) states specializing, in part, in Sarbanes-Oxley representations against Fortune 500 companies. In addition, qui tam litigation on behalf of individual whistleblowers in association with the United States Department of Justice against corporations for their violations of the Federal False Claims Act by their defrauding the United States government.
*The above Recent Cases, Jury Verdicts and Settlements are provided in accordance with Legal-Ethics Opinion 1750 Advertising Issues and Rule 7.1 of the Virginia State Bar Rules of Professional Conduct effective January 1, 2000.
The results obtained in these Recent Cases, Jury Verdicts and Settlements are solely dependent on those variety of factors included in these particular cases. Further, each of these cases consisted of circumstances which were peculiar or unique to the specific case and as a result you, the public, should not rely upon these cases, as a predictor of the result likely to be obtained in your case. That is, your case is likely never to have a set of circumstances which precisely duplicates these cases, and as a result advertisement of the above cases, may not provide helpful information to you the consumer and in fact may mislead you as to the result that will be obtained in your case should you decide to retain our firm. These cases are listed solely for your information as each case accurately represents our firm work product solely in these particular cases, not in cases similar to your case. |
